Legal Opinion

State v. Autry

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 3, 1988No. 468A86PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEYER, Justice.

On his appeal to our Court, defendant brings forward three assignments of error relative to the guilt-innocence phase of his trial. Having considered the entire record and each of defendant’s assignments in turn, we find no prejudicial error in defendant’s trial. Accordingly, we leave undisturbed defendant’s multiple convictions and accompanying sentences.

Each of defendant’s multiple convictions arose from a single criminal episode which occurred on 13 and 14 November 1985. Because resolution of the issues presented in this case turns so substantially on the nature and the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Otey v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. State v. FortneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. State v. MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  2. State v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  3. State v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  4. State v. GreeneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  5. State v. MitchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API