Legal Opinion

Laws v. Aschenbeck

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 5, 1950PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

Mary E. Aschenbeck and William F. Laws have appealed from orders of the Probate Court denying their motions to frame the following issues for trial by jury in relation to the petition for probate of the will of Margaret Laws, late of Beverly: “1. Was the instrument propounded for probate as the last will of Margaret Laws executed according to law? 2. Did said Margaret Laws execute said instrument with the understanding and purpose that it should be her last will and testament? ” A third request •for the framing of an issue as to the exercise of fraud or undue influence on the part of William…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fuller v. SylviaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  2. Clark v. McNeilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  3. Cook v. MosherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  4. Nunn v. EhlertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  5. LeBlanc v. CoombesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Flynn v. PrindevilleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
  2. Harper v. HarperMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
  3. Mowat v. DelucaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
  4. Hunt v. BradfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
  5. Love v. LoveMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API