Reynolds v. Williams
New York Supreme Court
Mandamus by one Reynolds against one Williams. Demurrer sustained, with leave to relator to apply to the Special Term for an amended writ within 20 days upon payment of costs.
1Opinion of the CourtBenedict, J.
[1] The allowance of the alternative writ did not, in my judgment, render the question of sufficiency res as claimed on behalf of the relator. Were a different rule to be adopted, sections 2073 and 2076 of the Civil Code would in some cases be rendered nugatory. People ex rel. Michales v. Ahearn, 111 App. Div. 741, 98 N. Y. Supp. 492; People ex rel. Caridi v. Creelman, 150 App. Div. 746, 135 N. Y. Supp. 718; People ex rel. Meeks v. Drummond, by Pendleton, J., Law Journal, June 14, 1912.
[2] The writ is obnoxious to the objection that it does not contain a statement of the facts constituting…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People ex rel. Caridi v. CreelmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
- People ex rel. McDonald v. ClausenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- Ramsay v. . HayesNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- People ex rel. Michales v. AhearnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
- People ex rel. Egan v. Columbia ClubNew York Supreme Court · 1891
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Reynolds v. WilliamsNew York Supreme Court · 1915