Bell v. Andrews
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court
4 U.S. 152 (____)
4 Dall. 152
Bell
versus
Andrews,
Supreme Court of United States.
But, by the COURT:
The payment of the consideration money, may, certainly, be proved by parol evidence. The agreement, being then executed by one of the parties, is not affected by the act of assembly; and it is settled, that the English statute against frauds and perjuries, was never extended to Pennsylvania. The act of assembly does not make a parol agreement, for the sale of lands, void; though it restricts the operation of the agreement, as to the acquisition of an interest in the land, and no title in fee simple…
2Cited by18 opinions
- Hertzog v. Hertzog's AdministratorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1859
- Pugh v. GoodSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1841
- Abell v. DouglassNew York Supreme Court · 1847
- Meason v. KaineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
- Bowser v. CessnaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.