Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Doe

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1840Published

This cause was tried in the Court below at the November term, 1839, before the Hon. Peter Lott and a jury. A verdict was rendered for the plaintiff, upon which the Court rendered judgment, “ that the plaintiff recover from the defendant his said term, in the said declaration mentioned, unexpired and to come, &c., and that a writ of habere facias possessionem be awarded him,” &c. The defendant appealed to this Court.

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, Justice

This was an action of ejectment commenced by the plaintiff, on demises from William Henderson and several others, against Coleman for the recovery of the northwest quarter of section 26, in T. 7 N., of R. 4 E. of the fourth principal meridian, containing one hundred and sixty acres of land. The defendant pleaded not guilty. On the trial of the cause, the lessors of the plaintiff read in evidence, to the jury, a patent from the United States to William Henderson, for the lot in question, and proved that Coleman, at the time of the commencement of the suit, was in possession of seventy-three…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Doe ex dem. Marston v. ButlerNew York Supreme Court · 1829
  2. Ex parte ReynoldsNew York Supreme Court · 1804
  3. Jackson v. HasbrouckNew York Supreme Court · 1810
  4. Jackson ex dem. Butler v. DitzNew York Supreme Court · 1800
  5. Jackson ex dem. Low v. ReynoldsNew York Supreme Court · 1803

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API