United States v. Groesbeck
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of tbe district court of the first district. The evidence touching the qualifications of Philip Grill, one of the trial jurors, was brought up by a bill of exceptions, which was settled and signed by the trial judge; the record was silent as to the bill of exceptions containing all of the evidence on that point. The other facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.
Read the full summary
Appeal from a judgment of tbe district court of the first district. The evidence touching the qualifications of Philip Grill, one of the trial jurors, was brought up by a bill of exceptions, which was settled and signed by the trial judge; the record was silent as to the bill of exceptions containing all of the evidence on that point. The other facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court. The counts in tbis indictment are not such as should have been united in the same indictment. Section 1024, Bev. Stat., U. S., provides that two or more acts or transactions of the same class…
1Opinion of the Court
Zane, C. J.:
The defendant was tried in the first district court on an indictment containing two counts, and convicted and sentenced to imprisonment and to pay a fine on each. From that judgment he has appealed to this court. The first count charges the defendant with unlawful cohabitation between the first day of January, 1884, and the thirteenth day of June, of the same year, with the three women named. And the second is for unlawful cohabitation with the same women between the last date above named and the thirty-first day of the following December. To both of these counts the defendant…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Morey v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- People Ex Rel. Tweed v. . LiscombNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Cannon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Commonwealth v. ConnorsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
- Martin v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1875