Legal Opinion

Holmes v. Hengen

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1903PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Action upon a promissory note.

1Opinion of the CourtGreenbaum, J.

The conceded facts are that the defendant is the indorser before maturity of a promissory note made on August 13, 1890, in Omaha, ¡Nebraska, where all *522the parties to the transaction then resided. The note matured on August 13, 1891. The holder, maker and indorser were then still residents of ¡Nebraska. After maturity the defendant moved to the State of Texas, where he had a continuous residence for upward of four years. At the time of the commencement of this action he was and he still is a resident of this State. The note was assigned to plaintiff, a resident of this State, on November 30,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Webster v. DaviesNebraska Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Thomas D. George, John C. Winthrop, and Charles F. Fink v. Douglas Aircraft Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  2. In re the Accounting of SchneiderNew York Surrogate's Court · 1950
  3. Bank of Boston International of Miami v. Arguello TefelDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1986
  4. Lehigh Valley R. v. ComarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907
  5. Thomas D. George, John C. Winthrop, and Charles F. Fink v. Douglas Aircraft Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API