State v. Arnold
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Watts, J., Greenwood, February, 1907. Indictment against Henry Arnold for unlawful transportation of liquors. From sentence on verdict of guilty, defendant appeals. cites: The indictment should allege place to which the transportation is made: 11 Ency.
Read the full summary
Before Watts, J., Greenwood, February, 1907. Indictment against Henry Arnold for unlawful transportation of liquors. From sentence on verdict of guilty, defendant appeals. cites: The indictment should allege place to which the transportation is made: 11 Ency. P. & P., 572; 1 Rich., 179; 3 McC., 442; 1 Bail., 144; 2 Hill., 459; 1 McM., 488; 17 S. C., 473; 19 S. C., 140; 28 S. C., 16; 2 Brev., 262. Under dispensary law it is only unlawful to transport into a dry county: 63 S. C., 460; 19 S. C., 140. Finding facts should be left to jury: 31 S. C., 238; 30 S. C., 93; 47 S. C., 488. Correction of…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Jones.
The defendant! was convicted and sentenced at the Court of General Sessions for Greenwood County for violating section 27 of the dispensary act, approved February 16, 1907, 25 Stat, 463.
The indictment charged: “That Henry Arnold, late of the county and State aforesaid, on the second day of March, 1907, with force and arms, at Greenwood, in the county and State aforesaid, did wilfully and unlawfully carry and transport from place to place in Greenwood county, in said State, where the manufacture and sale of liquor is prohibited,…
2Cited by8 opinions
- State v. TurnerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1921
- Stokes v. MurraySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1914
- State v. ElliottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
- State v. BrightSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
- State v. KusickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.