Mizell v. Byington
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) The only questions here presented are whether the petition set out a caiise of action against W. C. Byington, and whether it set out a cause of action against Laura E. Byington.
It is well settled that where a petition is attacked by a general demurrer, the demurrer admits as true all the facts set forth in the petition; and that the demurrer should be overruled if any part of the petition presents a cause of action against the named defendant. The instant petition, properly construed, presents an action 'in tort by the plaintiffs to recover damages…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hall v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- Daniel v. Perkins Logging Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
- Baldwin v. McLendonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
3Cited by4 opinions
- Atlanta & West Point Railroad v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
- Smith v. Republic Realty Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
- Hartridge v. Savannah News-Press, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- Whitehead v. NixCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966