Legal Opinion

Mizell v. Byington

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 13, 1946No. 31111PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The only questions here presented are whether the petition set out a caiise of action against W. C. Byington, and whether it set out a cause of action against Laura E. Byington.

It is well settled that where a petition is attacked by a general demurrer, the demurrer admits as true all the facts set forth in the petition; and that the demurrer should be overruled if any part of the petition presents a cause of action against the named defendant. The instant petition, properly construed, presents an action 'in tort by the plaintiffs to recover damages…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hall v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  2. Daniel v. Perkins Logging Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  3. Baldwin v. McLendonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Atlanta & West Point Railroad v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
  2. Smith v. Republic Realty Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  3. Hartridge v. Savannah News-Press, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  4. Whitehead v. NixCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API