Legal Opinion

Barfield v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided June 6, 1995No. 2351934PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOON, Chief Judge.

Archie Barfield appeals his bench trial convictions of rape and forcible sodomy. He argues that the trial judge erred by proceeding in his absence when, after the court had recessed at the end of the first day of trial, he failed to appear for the second and concluding day of trial. Because we find Barfield’s absence from the second day of trial to be a knowing and voluntary waiver of his right to be present as guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment and Code § 19.2-259, we hold the trial court did not err in proceeding in his absence; accordingly, we affirm.

At the conclusion of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Diaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Crosby v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Quintana v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cruz v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1997
  2. Virginia Board of Medicine v. John Henry Hagmann, M.D.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2017
  3. Cruz v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1996
  4. Cruz v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1996
  5. Cruz v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API