Legal Opinion

Slayton v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided January 26, 1934No. Docket Nos. 57267, 57268Published

A purported transaction in corporate shares between parents and child, held, under all the circumstances, lacking in intent to transfer ownership and therefore not a sale giving rise to a deduction for loss.

1Opinion of the Court

LUELLA HOYT SLAYTON, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

VIRGINIA S. STRAW, HOVEY E. SLAYTON, JR., EDWARD F. MESSINGER, EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF HOVEY E. SLAYTON, DECEASED, PETITIONERS, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Slayton v. Commissioner

Docket Nos. 57267, 57268.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

29 B.T.A. 931; 1934 BTA LEXIS 1457;

January 26, 1934, Promulgated

A purported transaction in corporate shares between parents and child, held, under all the circumstances, lacking in intent to transfer ownership and therefore not a sale giving rise to a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Slayton v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API