Legal Opinion

Riggings Homeowners, Inc. v. Coastal Resources Commission

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 6, 2013No. COA12-1299PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNTER, JR., Robert N., Judge.

The North Carolina Coastal Resources Commission (the “Commission”) appeals atrial court order: (i) reversing the Commission’s denial of a variance request; and (ii) remanding the case to the Commission for new hearing. Riggings Homeowners, Inc. cross-appeals, alleging: (i) the trial court erred in concluding the Commission did not need to make a “reasonable use” determination; (ii) the Commission’s variance denial violated the takings doctrine; and (iii) the Commission’s variance denial violated the separation of powers doctrine. Upon review, we affirm.

I. Facts &…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. In Re the Appeal From the Civil PenaltySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural Resources v. CarrollSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  3. State Ex Rel. Commissioner of Insurance v. North Carolina Rate BureauSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Adams v. North Carolina Department of Natural & Economic ResourcesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  5. Dunn v. PateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dolezal-Soukup v. Dodge Cty. Bd. of AdjustmentNebraska Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Riggings Homeowners, Inc. v. Coastal Res. Comm'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API