Legal Opinion

People v. Hanks

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 27, 2002No. 1 — 00 — 2519, 1 — 00 — 3854 consPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Karnezis

Petitioner Edward Hanks appeals the circuit court’s summary dismissal of his pro se petitions for relief pursuant to the Post-Conviction Hearing Act (hereinafter the Act) (725 ILCS 5/122 — 1 et seq. (West 2000)). The circuit court dismissed petitioner’s initial and successive petitions after finding the issues raised therein to be frivolous and patently without merit.

Petitioner was convicted of aggravated criminal sexual assault and armed robbery following a jury trial. The trial court sentenced petitioner to extended terms of 60 years’ imprisonment for aggravated criminal sexual assault and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. People v. ColemanIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  5. People v. EdwardsIllinois Supreme Court · 2001

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. DavisAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  2. People v. MunozAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  3. People v. WrightAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013
  4. People v. DavisAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  5. People v. MunozAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API