Legal Opinion

Passut v. Heubner

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1913PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from an interlocutory judgment of the City Court of the city of New York sustaining a demurrer on the ground of defect of parties plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtPage, J.

Though there are a few authorities to the. contrary (Samuels v. Evans, 1 McLean, 473; Spaulding v. Evans, 2 id. 139; Ellis v. McLemoor, 1 Bailey [S. C.], 13) the weight of authority in this country overwhelmingly supports the contention of the respondent that a promissory note payable to two persons in the alternative creates a joint interest in the payees and either cannot in the lifetime of the other sue thereon with*250out joining the other joint obligee. Willoughby v. Willoughby, 5 N. H. 244; Osgood v. Pearsons, 70 Mass. 455; Carr v. Bauer, 61 Ill. App. 504; Westgate v. Healy, 4 R. I. 523;…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Collyer v. CookIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902
  2. Carr v. BauerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1895
  3. Osgood v. PearsonsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1855
  4. Samuels v. EvansU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Illinois · 1839

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sweeney v. Van SchaickAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API