Legal Opinion

People v. Boyles

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 23, 1994Published

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant failed to preserve for review his challenge to the sufficiency of the plea allocution by failing to move to withdraw his plea of guilty or to vacate the judgment of conviction pursuant to CPL 440.10 (see, People, v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665; People v Byron, 197 AD2d 914), and we decline to address it as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see, CPL 470.15 [6] [a]).

Upon our review of the record, we conclude that, the sentence is neither unduly harsh nor excessive. (Appeal from Judgment of Cattaraugus County Court, Himelein,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. People v. ByronAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API