Legal Opinion
Green v. Saisselin
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 10, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
For the decision of this appeal it is unnecessary to determine whether the phrases “ the original owner,” as used in section 288 of the Civil Practice Act, and “ an original owner,” as used in section 289 of the Civil Practice Act, apply only to the very first owner or assignor or may be extended to embrace owners or assignors intermediate in the chain of title. The original statute (Laws of 1920, chap. 91, amdg. Code Civ. Proc. § 872, subd. 5) seems to have been broad enough to cover the latter. (But see Wappler v. Woodbury Co., 206 App. Div. 452; Redfield v. National Petroleum Corp., 211…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Vosburgh v. . DiefendorfNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Lattimer v. Sun-Herald Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- Weiss v. GoldbergerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- Wappler v. Woodbury Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
3Cited by3 opinions
- Stevens v. SilvermanCity of New York Municipal Court · 1935
- Darnet Realty Corp. v. ReynoldsNew York Supreme Court · 1962
- Winters National Bank and Trust Co. v. Greenberg Automotive & Radio Co.New York Supreme Court · 1930