Legal Opinion
Castillo v. Buday
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 1, 2000No. 99 CIV 1372 JESPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SPRIZZO, District Judge.
Plaintiff pro se brings this action against Charles Buday, W. Glasser, J. Peryea, and C. Grima, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988 alleging that defendants violated his Eight Amendment rights. Defendants move to dismiss this action pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on the ground that plaintiff has failed to exhaust his administrative remedies as required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1996 (“PLRA”). For the reasons stated below, defendants’ motion to dismiss is granted.
BACKGROUND
The following facts, taken from…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Hudson v. McMillianSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Eduardo M. Perez v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections and Michael J. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Douglas Nyhuis v. Janet Reno, Attorney General Eric Holder, Deputy Attorney General Kathleen Hawk, Director-Bop John Hahn, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ronald Nussle v. Willette, Correction Officer, and Porter, Correction OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000