Legal Opinion
Ross v. Mauro Chevrolet
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided December 28, 2006No. 1-06-0156PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRESIDING JUSTICE QUINN
delivered the opinion of the court:
Plaintiff Charisse Ross has filed an interlocutory appeal from the dismissal of counts III and IV in her third amended complaint against defendants Mauro Chevrolet, Inc. (Mauro), Chicago police officers Christopher Kaporis and Benny Pambuku, and the City of Chicago (City). On appeal, plaintiff contends that the circuit court erred in dismissing her claims of false arrest, false imprisonment, and malicious prosecution against the officers and the City.
BACKGROUND
The facts of this case are largely undisputed. On October 13, 2003,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Atwater v. City of Lago VistaSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- James N. Gramenos v. Jewel Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Holmes v. Village of Hoffman EstatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Stokes v. Board of Educ. of the City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Swearnigen-El v. Cook County Sheriff's DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- McBride v. GriceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Michael Seiser v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.