Legal Opinion
Palme v. Commissioner of Public Safety
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 16, 1985No. C9-84-2208PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIERENGARTEN, Judge.
This is an appeal by Arnold Palme from an order of the district court sustaining the revocation of his driver’s license pursuant to the Minnesota implied consent laws, Minn.Stat. § 169.123 (1984). Palme claims he was not in “physical control” of his automobile. We affirm.
FACTS
Officer Claussen of the North St. Paul Police Department observed, early in the morning, a pickup truck parked with its lights on in the handicapped parking zone of Weber’s Bowling Alley and Supper Club in North St. Paul. The truck did not have handicapped license plates or a handicapped decal.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State, Department of Public Safety v. JuncewskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. ThurmerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- State, City of Falcon Heights v. PazderskiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Dufrane v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Bielejeski v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. StarfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- State, Department of Public Safety, Division of Motor Vehicles v. ConleyAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
- Roberts v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Sens v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Short v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.