State v. Cline

*828GEORGE M. FLANIGAN, Special Judge,

concurring in part and dissenting in part.

I concur fully in part II of the principal opinion. I respectfully dissent from part I because, in my view, the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict.

It was incumbent upon the state to prove defendant’s knowledge of the “nature of the substance.” State v. Barber, 635 S.W.2d 342, 343-44 (Mo.1982). To similar effect see State v. Gulley, 776 S.W.2d 492, 494 (Mo.App.1989); State v. Garrett, 765 S.W.2d 314, 315 (Mo.App.1988); State v. Vincent, 755 S.W.2d 400, 401 (Mo.App.1988); State v. Moiser, 738 S.W.2d 549,…