Berger v. Urban Motion Picture Industries, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Kelly, P. J.:
The pleadings consisted of an amended complaint and the answer thereto.
The action was commenced August 24, 1923. The complaint contains two causes of action. In the first cause of action the 6 plaintiff sets out a written contract dated June 15, 1920 (copy attached to the complaint), by which defendant employs plaintiff as its chief mechanical engineer for the period of five years beginning August 1, 1920, at a weekly salary of $150 until its factory shall start production, but not later than August 1, 1921, after which date plaintiff is to receive $200 per week or such increased…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Howard v. . DalyNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Brownell v. . Town of GreenwichNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Helgar Corporation v. . Warner's FeaturesNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- William Wharton, Jr., & Co. v. WinchNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Davis v. DodgeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Utica Trust & Deposit Co. v. SuttonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- Reichhold Chemicals, Inc. v. WellsNew York Supreme Court · 1947
- Rosenthal v. BecherCity of New York Municipal Court · 1936
- Rosenthal v. SchaeferNew York Supreme Court · 1927