Legal Opinion

Lyttle v. BankUnited

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 24, 2013No. 5D10-3790PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This is an appeal of a summary judgment entered in a mortgage foreclosure case where the name of the payee on the note was not the name of the plaintiff in the foreclosure action. Appellee was the plaintiff in the trial proceedings. In Richards v. HSBC Bank USA, 91 So.3d 233 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012), this court held:

A plaintiff must tender the original promissory note to the trial court or seek to reestablish the note under section 673.3091, Florida Statutes (2010). If the note does not name the plaintiff as. the payee, the note must bear an endorsement in favor of the plaintiff or a blank…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Richards v. HSBC Bank USADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Phan v. Deutsche Bank National Trust CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API