Legal Opinion
Ralph Hochman & Co. v. Fort Stanwix Mfg. Co.
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided May 16, 1967No. Civ. A. No. 9702PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
PORT, District Judge.
In this suit for brokerage commissions, submitted on a stipulation of facts, the parties are in accord as to the facts and the applicable law. The plaintiff bases its claim to relief on a brokerage agreement (Exhibit A) and a contract of sale (Exhibit B), both of which are incorporated in plaintiff’s complaint and discussed below. The parties are in court because they reach contrary results in applying the conceded legal principles to the stipulated facts; each contends that the factual and legal situation mandates a verdict in its favor.
Jurisd…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gillet v. . Bank of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Muzak Corp. v. Hotel Taft Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1956
- Corhill Corp. v. S. D. Plants, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1961
- Darrow v. . Family Fund SocietyNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Wagner v. DerecktorNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cogan v. Kidder, Mathews & Segner, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1982
- Dubin Weston, Inc. v. Louis Capano & Sons, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1975
- Ralph Hochman & Co. v. Fort Stanwix Mfg. Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1968
- Addison Terry Co. v. N.F.L. Films, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- Mohawk Rubber Co. v. United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic WorkersDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.