Legal Opinion

T. M. Crutcher Laboratory v. Crutcher

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided December 19, 1941PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Morris, Commissioner—

Affirming.

The suit below was instituted by tbe T. M. Crutcher Laboratory, hereafter called laboratory, by Kenneth Young a minority stockholder, suing for the corporation and in his own behalf as a stockholder. Young died dur ing litigation and suit was revived in the name of the administratrix. Defendants were Dr. Crutcher, T. M. Crutcher Dental Depot, referred to later as depot, and other laboratory stockholders.

The laboratory was incorporated in 1926, with an authorized stock of 250 shares of $100 par value. Dr. Crutcher held 126 shares, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  2. Helton v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Compressed Gas Corporation, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. United States Steel Corporation and Jack B. Kelley, Inc., Defendants- Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  2. Pope v. Lydick Roofing Company of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Filbeck v. CoomerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
  4. Coe v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
  5. Brown v. L. v. Marks & Sons Co.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API