Legal Opinion

Lee v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 22, 1940No. 21079PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KRUEGER, Judge.

Appellant was convicted for knowingly permitting a gaming device, commonly known as a a slot machine, to remain in his possession and on his premises under his control to be used for gaming purposes, etc. His punishment was assessed at confinement in the county jail for a period of thirty days.

Appellant was prosecuted under Art. 630, P. C., which reads as follows: “If any person shall knowingly permit any gaming paraphernalia, table, or device or equipment of a gaming house, of any character whatever to remain in his possession or on premises under his control or of which he is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McMillan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1933
  2. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. GilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API