Legal Opinion

State v. Farmer

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided September 3, 1998No. 24075, 24077PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PERRY, Judge.

In these consolidated appeals, Brandy Farmer challenges two orders of the district court revoking probation and ordering execution of her sentences. On appeal, she raises three claims for relief. First, she asserts that at the probation revocation hearing the district court erred in finding that the results of a urinalysis test were credible and reliable. Second, Farmer contends that her right to confrontation was denied at the hearing. Finally, she asserts that the district court abused its discretion in imposing sentence upon revocation of probation. We affirm.

I

BACKGROUND

In…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. United States v. Bruce BellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  4. United States v. Rickey Dean SimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. United States v. Daniel Douglas MartinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. RoseIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. James Andrew AllenIdaho Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. State v. Michael Douglas WhiteIdaho Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. State v. Michael Douglas WhiteIdaho Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. State v. Michael Douglas WhiteIdaho Court of Appeals · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API