Legal Opinion

People v. Washington

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 26, 1976No. 75-166PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rechenmacher

The defendant, Walter Washington, Jr., was convicted by jury verdict of armed robbery and murder. He contends that (1) certain statements he made while in custody at Rockford Police Headquarters, after he had requested an attorney, should not have been admitted into evidence, (2) the trial court abused its discretion in denying defendant’s motion to exclude at trial his record of a 1965 conviction for burglary, and (3) certain evidence was improperly obtained by the police in an automobile, and therefore should not have been admitted into evidence. (His third contention was raised in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Cardwell v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. The People v. MontgomeryIllinois Supreme Court · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. StoneAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  2. People v. WashingtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  3. People v. YoungAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  4. People v. MrozekAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  5. People v. BundyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API