People v. Washington
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rechenmacher
The defendant, Walter Washington, Jr., was convicted by jury verdict of armed robbery and murder. He contends that (1) certain statements he made while in custody at Rockford Police Headquarters, after he had requested an attorney, should not have been admitted into evidence, (2) the trial court abused its discretion in denying defendant’s motion to exclude at trial his record of a 1965 conviction for burglary, and (3) certain evidence was improperly obtained by the police in an automobile, and therefore should not have been admitted into evidence. (His third contention was raised in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Cardwell v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- The People v. MontgomeryIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- People v. StoneAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
- People v. WashingtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
- People v. YoungAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
- People v. MrozekAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
- People v. BundyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.