Legal Opinion

People v. Witherow

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 28, 1983No. Docket Nos. AO18044, AO20182PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ELKINGTON, J.

We have consolidated defendant Witherow’s appeal from a judgment, based upon his plea of guilty to a charge of possessing a concealable firearm by one who had previously been convicted of a felony (Pen. Code, § 12021), with his related initial and supplemental applications for a writ of habeas corpus.

For reasons we now state we affirm the judgment and deny the habeas corpus application.

The Appeal

It is first contended that: “The trial court committed reversible error in sentencing appellant without stating its reasons for imposing the upper term.”

As further argued by…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. People v. PopeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. People v. DeVaughnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. People v. ChaddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Stephens v. ToomeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  5. People v. ManriquezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. GuerreroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  2. People v. GuerreroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API