People v. Witherow
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ELKINGTON, J.
We have consolidated defendant Witherow’s appeal from a judgment, based upon his plea of guilty to a charge of possessing a concealable firearm by one who had previously been convicted of a felony (Pen. Code, § 12021), with his related initial and supplemental applications for a writ of habeas corpus.
For reasons we now state we affirm the judgment and deny the habeas corpus application.
The Appeal
It is first contended that: “The trial court committed reversible error in sentencing appellant without stating its reasons for imposing the upper term.”
As further argued by…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- People v. PopeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. DeVaughnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- People v. ChaddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Stephens v. ToomeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- People v. ManriquezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. GuerreroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- People v. GuerreroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993