Legal Opinion

Duke v. Houston Oil Co. of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 1, 1939No. 3440Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing.

In support of our conclusion presuming as a matter of law the deed from Henderson back to Ryan, in overruling motion for rehearing, we cite the following additional authorities: Clements v. Texas Co., Tex.Civ.App., 273 S.W. 993, 998; De Ramirez v. De Ramirez, Tex.Civ.App., 29 S.W.2d 872; Allen v. Clearman, 60 Tex.Civ.App. 589, 128 S.W. 1140, 1145; Surghenor v. Ducey, Tex.Civ.App., 139 S.W. 22; Baldwin v. Roberts, 13 Tex.Civ.App. 563, 36 S.W. 789.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Clements v. Texas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  2. Surghenor v. DuceyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  3. Baldwin v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896
  4. De Ramirez v. De RamirezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  5. Allen v. ClearmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910