New York University v. Arnold
Civil Court of the City of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Paul L. Klein, J.
On its prima facie case, petitioner succeeded in showing that respondent’s conduct makes him an undesirable tenant and. justifies eviction, absent effective rebuttal on respondent’s case. There was no such rebuttal.
I turn now to the question of a stay, under RPAPL 753 or other provision of law.1 Section 753 provides for a stay of (up to) six months if certain criteria are met (subd 1), but not where the respondent’s conduct has been found "objectionable” (subd 3). There is no question that Mr. Arnold meets the *1041criteria for the mercy of a stay;2 there is,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- New York State Thruway Authority v. Maislin Bros. Transport Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
- Saltzburg v. Utica Home Telephone Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913