Legal Opinion
Bouchard Transp. Co. v. Long Island Lighting Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 24, 2020No. 19-1143-cvUnpublished
1Opinion of the Court
19-1143-cv Bouchard Transp. Co., et al. v. Long Island Lighting Co., et al. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT=S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Marvel Characters, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Joseph H. Simon, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. FlintSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Smith v. Bayer Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
- B&B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Securities Exchange Commission v. Monarch Funding Corporation, Leo M. Eisenberg, Steven R. Cloyes, and Richard M. Cannistraro, Richard O. BertoliCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.