Legal Opinion

State v. Aizupitis

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided February 19, 2019No. 9507001267Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) v. ) I.D. No. 9507001267 ) VARIS AIZUPITIS, ) ) Defendant. ) Upon Consideration of Defendant’s Motion for Postconviction Relief DENIED Date Submitted: November 21, 2018 Date Decided: February 19, 2019 James V. Apostolico, Esq., and Andrew J. Vella, Esq., Department of Justice, Wilmington, Delaware. Attorney for the State. Varis Aizupitis, Pro se. DAVIS, J. INTRODUCTION This is a criminal case after conviction. The history regarding the post-conviction relief sought here is unusual and lengthy. Counsel for Defendant Varis R.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Younger v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
  3. Dawson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996
  4. Flamer v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
  5. Wayne Paul Burkett v. Richard Cunningham, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API