Legal Opinion · Dissent

Manley v. MacFarland

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 4, 1958No. 8545Published

1Dissent

McQUADE, Justice,

with whom KEE-TON, Chief Justice, concurs (dissenting).

A review of the record discloses the findings of fact entered by the trial court in some instances are not warranted by inferences of the evidence. It must be pointed out that insofar as the Boise Payette company is concerned — the only principal defendant insofar as this Court is concerned — there is no contract of employment in the record upon which a judgment can be sustained. That is to say, no knowledge of the contract of employment between the respondents and the owners of the premises can be imputed to the Boise…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Masterson v. RobertsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  2. Rio Grande Lumber & Fuel Co. v. BuergoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Bunt v. RobertsIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Boise-Payette Lumber Co. v. McCornickIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Mundet Cork Corp. v. Three Flowers Ice Cream Co. (mo.app.K.C. 1941)Missouri Court of Appeals · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API