Legal Opinion

In Re Act Manufacturing, Inc.

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided August 8, 2002No. 19-10098PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

JOEL B. ROSENTHAL, Bankruptcy Judge.

Before the Court are several fee applications for interim compensation pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 331. 1 Bell Electrical Supply and H & S Manufacturing Co. filed general objections to the foregoing. 2 Pursuant to this Court’s Order Granting Motion to Establish Interim Compensation Procedures [# 94] and the Modification to Interim Compensation Order and Order to File Fee Applications [# 212] 3 (collectively, the “Compensation Orders”), the professionals have been receiving payment of all of their invoiced fees and expenses on a monthly…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Dolores J. Copeland, Individually and on Behalf of the Class of All Others Similarly Situated v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  4. Annabelle Lipsett v. Gumersindo BlancoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  5. John Furtado v. Harold BishopCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In Re Fibermark, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 2006
  2. In Re LaFranceUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
  3. In Re New Boston Coke Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
  4. In re Wolverine, Proctor & Schwartz, LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
  5. In Re ClaudioUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API