Legal Opinion

People v. Hankin

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided December 5, 1997PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Joseph Kevin McKay, J.

The defense moves for dismissal of the accusatory instrument pursuant to CPL 170.30. For the reasons stated below, the motion is granted.

The defendant is charged in a misdemeanor information with one count of a violation of Judiciary Law § 482, which is designated a misdemeanor in Judiciary Law § 485, and one count of falsifying business records in the second degree in violation of Penal Law § 175.05, a class A misdemeanor. The defendant is a duly admitted and currently practicing attorney in the State of New York, with offices in New York County.

The…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Edenfield v. FaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. People v. FelixNew York Court of Appeals · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. John Robert HoymanSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
  2. People v. HankinCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1998
  3. Amended July 13, 2015 State of Iowa v. John Robert HoymanSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API