Legal Opinion

People v. Merritt

California Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 2017No. S231644PublishedCited by 95 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChin, J.

*821 A jury convicted defendant Andre Merritt of two counts of robbery and found true allegations that he personally used a firearm during both robberies. However, the trial court failed to give the standard jury instruction on the elements of robbery. The failure to instruct on the elements of a charged crime is serious constitutional error that impacts a defendant's fundamental right to a jury trial. We must decide whether the error can ever be found harmless.

In People v. Cummings (1993) 4 Cal.4th 1233 , 18 Cal.Rptr.2d 796 , 850 P.2d 1 ( Cummings ), this court held similar error to be…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by95 opinions

  1. People v. RiveraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  2. People v. AledamatCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  3. People v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  4. People v. CanizalesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Niles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2018

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API