People v. Merritt
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChin, J.
*821 A jury convicted defendant Andre Merritt of two counts of robbery and found true allegations that he personally used a firearm during both robberies. However, the trial court failed to give the standard jury instruction on the elements of robbery. The failure to instruct on the elements of a charged crime is serious constitutional error that impacts a defendant's fundamental right to a jury trial. We must decide whether the error can ever be found harmless.
In People v. Cummings (1993) 4 Cal.4th 1233 , 18 Cal.Rptr.2d 796 , 850 P.2d 1 ( Cummings ), this court held similar error to be…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by95 opinions
- People v. RiveraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
- People v. AledamatCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
- People v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
- People v. CanizalesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
- Niles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2018
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.