Legal Opinion
Hall v. Witteman
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 19, 2009No. 08-3251, 08-3299PublishedCited by 121 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARTZ, Circuit Judge.
George Milam Hall submitted to a local newspaper, the Coffey County Republican (“The Republican”), an advertisement opposing the election bid of Judge Phillip M. Fromme. He paid to have the ad run on two occasions. The paper ran the ad the first time but not the second, instead running an ad supporting Judge Fromme, which was paid for and signed by a number of attorneys, including Coffey County Attorney Douglas Witteman. Mr. Hall filed suit in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas against The Republican, Judge Fromme, the signatory attorneys, and a…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Polk County v. DodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by121 opinions
- Bixler v. FosterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Schaffer v. Salt Lake City CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Barnett v. Hall, Estill, Hardwick, GableCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- Toone v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Moya v. GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.