Freeman v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
Appeal from Barbour Circuit Court. The indictment was sufficient. — Mitchell v. The State, 141 Ala. 90; Compton v. The State, 95 Ala. 25.
1Opinion of the Court
Violating Prohibition Law.
Heard before Hon. M. Sollie.
John Freeman was convicted , of violating , the prohibition law, and he appeals.
Affirmed.
No brief reached the Beporter.
The only question presented to us goes to the sufficiency of the indictment. The indictment was not subject to demurrer because it failed to name the party to whom the liquor was sold.—Jones v. State, 136 Ala. 118, 34 South. 236; Grace v. State, 1 Ala. App. 211, 56 South. 25. Section 7 of the act approved August 9, 1909 (General and Local Acts Special Session 1909, p. 12), which is “an act to promote temperance,” etc.,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
- Olmstead v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
- Grace v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1911
- Mitchell v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
- Tonsey v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
3Cited by3 opinions
- Adkins v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
- Edmondson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1912
- Adkins v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973