Legal Opinion

Parsons v. Parsons

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1992No. 17760PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Chief Justice.

Roger Parsons (Roger) appeals an award of alimony to his former wife, Dolores Parsons (Dolores). We affirm in part and reverse in part.

FACTS

This matter is again before this court after an appeal and remand in Parsons v. Parsons, 469 N.W.2d 581 (S.D.1991) (Parsons I). To once again outline the pertinent facts, the parties were married on May 25, 1967. Both parties had college educations at the time of the marriage. Roger had a bachelor’s degree in business administration and Dolores had a two year nursing degree. Both parties were employed during the marriage and Dolores…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Malcolm v. MalcolmSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Saint-Pierre v. Saint-PierreSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. BakerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Senger v. SengerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Ryken v. RykenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Billion v. BillionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Sanford v. SanfordSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Saxvik v. SaxvikSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Heckenlaible v. HeckenlaibleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Driscoll v. DriscollSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API