Legal Opinion

MacDonald v. Carlisle

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1947No. A-1270PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Taylor

On the 14th day of September, 1940, two instruments were executed and manually delivered by J. R. Carlisle and wife, Roxie Carlisle, to H. D. MacDonald. The first was an agreement whereby for a consideration of $50.00, MacDonald was given a 30-day option by the Carlisles to purchase from them a 10/144th undivided royalty interest in 144 acres of land. The second (executed and delivered at the same time) was a warranty deed of the same interest to the same vendee. The sale price of the interest as fixed by the option was $1,000.00. The option contract provided for one execution and delivery to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. WoodTexas Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Happ v. HappCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  4. Middlekauff v. State Banking BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Kimmell v. TiptonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Valley Stockyards Company v. KinselTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  2. South Texas Water Co. v. BieriCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  3. Huguley v. Board of Adjustment of City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  4. Estes v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
  5. Villarreal v. Boggus Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API