Legal Opinion

Stone Mountain Collision Center v. General Casualty Co. of Wisconsin

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 10, 2010No. A10A0905PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mikell, Judge.

Stone Mountain Collision Center filed an action against its insurer, General Casualty Company of Wisconsin, alleging breach of its insurance contract. General Casualty moved for summary judgment, arguing that the complaint was barred by the two-year limitation period contained in the applicable insurance policy. The trial court agreed with General Casualty and granted its motion for summary judgment. On appeal, Stone Mountain Collision argues that General Casualty waived the limitation period. We disagree and affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Summary judgment is proper when…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Matjoulis v. Integon General Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  2. Allstate Insurance v. SuttonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  3. Nee v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  4. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. MikellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  5. Giles v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. FIRST SOLAR ELECTRIC LLC v. ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2022
  2. Leilani Durden, et al. v. Auto-Owners Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2026
  3. Premier Eye Care Associates, P.C. v. Mag Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2020
  4. Premier Eye Care Associates, P.C. v. Mag Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2020
  5. Ronnie Shingler v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API