Gilling v. Eastern Airlines, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SAROKIN, District Judge.
I. Introduction
In order for the compulsory arbitration program to function properly, it is essential that the parties participate in a meaningful manner. This is particularly so in a case such as this in which one of the parties is a substantial corporation and the other party is one or more individuals. The purposes of the arbitration program are to provide the parties with a quick and inexpensive means of resolving their dispute while, at the same time, reducing the court’s caseload.
These purposes are thwarted when a party to the arbitration enters into it…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wesley Rhea v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Kimbrough v. Holiday InnDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
- New England Merchants National Bank v. HughesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gittings v. HartzNevada Supreme Court · 2000
- Casino Properties, Inc. v. AndrewsNevada Supreme Court · 1996
- Myers v. WiederholDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1999
- PPT Research, Inc. v. Solvay USA, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021