Legal Opinion

Gilling v. Eastern Airlines, Inc.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided March 2, 1988No. Civil 85-4917PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SAROKIN, District Judge.

I. Introduction

In order for the compulsory arbitration program to function properly, it is essential that the parties participate in a meaningful manner. This is particularly so in a case such as this in which one of the parties is a substantial corporation and the other party is one or more individuals. The purposes of the arbitration program are to provide the parties with a quick and inexpensive means of resolving their dispute while, at the same time, reducing the court’s caseload.

These purposes are thwarted when a party to the arbitration enters into it…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wesley Rhea v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  2. Kimbrough v. Holiday InnDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. New England Merchants National Bank v. HughesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gittings v. HartzNevada Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Casino Properties, Inc. v. AndrewsNevada Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Myers v. WiederholDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1999
  4. PPT Research, Inc. v. Solvay USA, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API