Legal Opinion

State v. Adams

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 4, 1995No. 1360PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fain, Judge.

Defendant-appellant, Joseph M. Adams, appeals from a judgment of forfeiture (of a bobcat carcass) pursuant to R.C. 2933.41(C). Adams contends that the forfeiture was a criminal and punitive sanction that violated his constitutionally guaranteed rights to protection from double jeopardy, because it was entered after the criminal complaint against him for possessing the illegally transported bobcat carcass had been dismissed on speedy trial grounds. Adams further contends that the trial court erred in concluding that the forfeiture motion was timely filed and in concluding that the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. United States v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. United States v. One Assortment of 89 FirearmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. GallOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. State v. GallOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. State v. Walker, Unpublished Decision (10-21-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API