Legal Opinion

Knauf v. Continental Bail Bonds, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 4, 1989No. 88-677PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FORET, Judge.

In this action, Robert W. Knauf, appellee herein, sued appellant, Continental Bail Bonds, Inc. (Continental), to recover a $2,500 premium he paid for a bail bond. Knauf claims that he is entitled to a refund of his bond premium pursuant to La.C. Cr.P. art. 338D because he had not failed to appear nor had he violated any court order prior to the time Continental surrendered him and got off his bond.

The trial court entered judgment in favor of Knauf, awarding him a partial refund of the bond premium in the amount of $1,000. Continental appeals, contending that no refund was due to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McConathy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  2. Yording v. WalkerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  3. Jordan v. KnightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. Bates, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API