Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Arrick

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 3, 1879No. Law. No. 14,380Published

The Case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cox

This case comes to us on exceptions to the rulings of the court below. The principal exception is to an instruction given by the court to the jury.

The facts assumed as the basis of the instruction are, that Horatio Ames, deceased, had a large claim against the United States ; that Clifford Arrick was the attorney to prosecute the claim for him in his lifetime, and, after his death, continued to act in that capacity for Charlotte L. Ames, his administratrix ; that Arrick collected on aecouut of said claim, besides other amounts, the sum of $39,955, for which the administratrix gave her…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ennis v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
  2. De Valengin's Administrators v. DuffySupreme Court of the United States · 1840
  3. Kearney v. SascerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1873
  4. Hagthorp v. Hook's Adm'rs D. B. N.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1829
  5. Lemmon v. HallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1863

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API