Legal Opinion

Petition of Bisenius

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 21, 1998No. 96-1594PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARTER, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the district court interpreting the parties’ dissolution of marriage decree, as modified, with respect to the obligation of petitioner-appel-lee, David E. Bisenius, to pay support for his children between ages eighteen and twenty-two, who qualify therefor under the definition contained in Iowa Code section 598.1(6) (1995). The appellee is respondent, Beatrice B. Bisenius, who, on April 7, 1995, initiated the present controversy by an application to adjudicate the amount of David’s arrearage in child support.

The issue presented to this court…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gail Ex Rel. Gail v. Western Convenience StoresSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
  2. Banco Mortgage Co. v. SteilSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  3. Mahaffa v. MahaffaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Spiker v. SpikerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
  2. In Re the Marriage of McCurninSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  3. In Re the Marriage of WilliamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  4. In re the Marriage of WhitfordCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2018
  5. Jay Driesen and Raymond Ehrman v. Iowa Department of Human Services, Misty Spooner, and Shayne MayerCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API