Legal Opinion
Miller v. Super Seal Container Corp.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 16, 1945No. Civil Action No. 24791PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLTZOFF, Justice.
This is an action by A. R. Miller against Gustave Glocker and Clarence Falk, to compel specific performance of an agreement made on August 17, 1939, between the plaintiff and the individual defendants, whereby the defendant Glocker agreed to deliver to the plaintiff 12,000 shares of the capital stock of the Super Seal Container Corporation. The Corporation is joined as a party defendant.
It is not disputed that pursuant to the agreement the plaintiff received in the aggregate 7,000 shares of stock, and that the balance of 5,000 shares were never delivered to him. He seeks to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lalone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Public Motor Service, Inc. v. Standard Oil Co. of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- Schofield v. ShifferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Sutherland v. MacLeodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Cuthbertson v. HillSupreme Court of Vermont · 1893
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re III Enterprises, Inc. VUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- Sami Omar v. Sharif Omar, Liptis Holdings LLC, Liptis Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Omar Holding Corp., New Life Holding Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2026