Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Squire v. Central United National Bank

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 17, 1935No. 428755PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*243OPINION

By DAVID RALPH HERTZ, J.

■ Viewed in the light of the high standards of fiduciary loyalty required of trustees, the Pool was a pernicious affair. It exposed the corpus of each trust to the twin parasites most destructive of trust estates; the trustee who sells his own property to the trust and the trustee who commingles the assets of the trust with his own.

It is one of the ironies of legal experience, however, that Ulmer v Fulton, Supt. of Banks, 129 Oh St 323; 2 OO 326; 195 NE, 557, should be cited herein as requiring that this court relegate these Certificate Holders to the position…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ulmer v. Fulton, Supt.Ohio Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Duncan v. DazeyIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Anderson v. NawaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  4. Herrick v. LynchIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Andrew v. Security Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Morris v. Investment Life Ins. Co. of AmericaOhio Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Republic-Odin Appliance Corp. v. Consumers Plumbing & Heating Supply Co.Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API