Legal Opinion

People v. Ratliff

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 19, 1974No. 12494PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Simkins

Defendant-appellant Kenneth Eugene Ratliff was tried before a jury, convicted of the crime of armed robbery, and sentenced 4 to 12 years. On appeal he contends that the judgment should be reduced from armed robbery to robbery since the weapon used was a .22-calibre pistol designed to fire blank cartridges, and therefore not a dangerous weapon.

Section 18 — -2(a) of the Criminal Code (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 38, par. 18 — 2(a)) provides that a person who commits a robbery while armed with a dangerous weapon is guilty of armed robbery. During the course of the trial the State stipulated that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. The People v. DwyerIllinois Supreme Court · 1927
  2. People v. TriceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1970

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. ButlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  2. People v. DavisIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  3. People v. SkeltonIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  4. People v. De La FuenteAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  5. People v. ThorneAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API