People v. Ratliff
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Simkins
Defendant-appellant Kenneth Eugene Ratliff was tried before a jury, convicted of the crime of armed robbery, and sentenced 4 to 12 years. On appeal he contends that the judgment should be reduced from armed robbery to robbery since the weapon used was a .22-calibre pistol designed to fire blank cartridges, and therefore not a dangerous weapon.
Section 18 — -2(a) of the Criminal Code (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 38, par. 18 — 2(a)) provides that a person who commits a robbery while armed with a dangerous weapon is guilty of armed robbery. During the course of the trial the State stipulated that…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- The People v. DwyerIllinois Supreme Court · 1927
- People v. TriceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1970
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. ButlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- People v. DavisIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
- People v. SkeltonIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
- People v. De La FuenteAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- People v. ThorneAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.