Legal Opinion

Barnhart v. Boyce

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 22, 1902PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Assumpsit.—Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Theodore Brentano, Judge presiding.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Windes

delivered the opinion of the court.

The principal contention of appellant’s counsel is, that the verdict and judgment is against the clear weight of the evidence, is contrary to undisputed evidence in the case, and in direct violation of the court’s instructions.

The evidence is voluminous, and in view of the conclusions reached need not be stated except in a general way. It shows, among others, the following facts: Appellee occupied the demised premises during the full term of the lease, and gave possession thereof to appellant on May 2, 1898. On the same day,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Scott v. Haverstraw Clay & Brick Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Waddell v. DeJetMississippi Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Judith Alter Kallman v. Radioshack Corporation, F/k/a Tandy Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  2. Edward E. Gustin & Co. v. Nebraska Building & Investment Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Weaver v. OsborneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API