Barnhart v. Boyce
Appellate Court of Illinois
Assumpsit.—Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Theodore Brentano, Judge presiding.
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Presiding Justice Windes
delivered the opinion of the court.
The principal contention of appellant’s counsel is, that the verdict and judgment is against the clear weight of the evidence, is contrary to undisputed evidence in the case, and in direct violation of the court’s instructions.
The evidence is voluminous, and in view of the conclusions reached need not be stated except in a general way. It shows, among others, the following facts: Appellee occupied the demised premises during the full term of the lease, and gave possession thereof to appellant on May 2, 1898. On the same day,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Scott v. Haverstraw Clay & Brick Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Waddell v. DeJetMississippi Supreme Court · 1898
3Cited by3 opinions
- Judith Alter Kallman v. Radioshack Corporation, F/k/a Tandy Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Edward E. Gustin & Co. v. Nebraska Building & Investment Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1923
- Weaver v. OsborneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912